Pull off the Roommate Switch, or Play to a Draw?

On December 8, 2014, I stepped on the scales to see how far I was from my Philmont goal weight. I weighed 278 pounds. That meant that I needed to lose about 40 pounds in six months. Based on my prior weight loss experience, I felt confident that I could do that, but I couldn’t afford to wait until January to get serious about losing weight. On January 5, I stepped on the scales again, and saw that I had gained six pounds since my early December weigh-in.

So I’ve arrived at another December thinking about the month’s impact on my weight. I don’t have the same kind of pressure that I had last December, but I’m coming off an October and November that weren’t particularly good for my weight.* So I do want to have a sensible December so that I can stop the recent slide that I’ve had.

*There’s some debate about the relative importance of diet compared to the importance of exercise in weight loss. I plan to post what I’ve experienced in this debate, but here’s a preview: I gained weight in November despite increasing my physical activity in preparation for my 5K, so for me, diet seems to be the more important factor. 

Almost everyone faces a similar challenge in December. I’ve had countless conversations with people about what December does to our waistlines, and studies show that most people expect to gain weight in December. According to some studies I’ve read about, the average American adult guesses that he or she will gain between seven and ten pounds during December (the actual average December weight gain is only about one pound).

So I’m going into this December intent on having a better experience than I did last December. In fact, I want to pull off The Dietary Equivalent of the Roommate Switch.

The Roommate Switch was featured in a “Seinfeld” episode called “The Switch.” In it, Jerry complains over lunch at the diner to George that he has become disenchanted with the woman he’s dating, but is interested in her roommate. George, recognizing the impossibility of successfully switching roommates, advises Jerry to “pay your check, leave here, and never mention this to anyone again.” He adds, “Do you realize in the entire history of Western civilization no one has successfully accomplished the Roommate Switch? In the Middle Ages you could get locked up for even suggesting it!”

Over the course of several hours, George and Jerry concoct a plan, which Jerry implements, with unexpected and hilarious results. My challenge is popularly recognized as equally impossible, and people may think I’m just as crazy for trying. I can’t say that I’ve really developed a similarly foolproof plan, but I’m trying to make sure that I maintain a high level of activity while eating reasonably–most of the time.

Maybe a better analogy comes from the world of sports. Two local sports radio personalities, Soren Petro and Kurtis Seaboldt from Sports Radio 810 WHB, have described their strategy as “playing to a draw.”

As an avid Sporting Kansas City fan, I’ve witnessed this strategy in sports. Sporting Park** is recognized throughout Major League Soccer as providing a tremendous home field advantage, so most visiting teams come into the park hoping not to win, but to emerge with a tie. To accomplish this, they play a highly defensive game, packing their players in the defensive end of the pitch*** to try to keep Sporting from scoring, but not really looking to score themselves. Sometimes this strategy forces Sporting to bring players further forward, creating opportunities for a single fast player from the visiting team to break away with the ball, potentially scoring by launching this counterattack.

**Now Children’s Mercy Sporting Park.

***That’s soccer for “field.” 

Similarly, I’m playing a largely defensive game. There are so many days when there are opportunities to be bad–holiday parties, snack days at work, special holiday-themed foods at restaurants and grocery stores, etc. I won’t be able to resist all of those temptations, so my strategy is to make sure that they don’t get out of hand. However, there will be opportunities to be more offensive–days when I don’t face these temptations–and if I make sure that I have plenty of physical activity and eat sensibly, I should be able to lose weight on those days. Those are my “counterattack” days when I will have scoring opportunities. This strategy gives me a chance to emerge victorious, but it’s one that is really more designed to produce a tie–no weight gain.

I don’t know whether it will work or not, but I’ll keep you posted. And regardless of the outcome, I’ll be working as hard in January 2016 as I did in this past January, and I’m expecting further progress throughout 2016.

 

WWWP5K: Mission Re-Defined, Extended, and Sort-of Accomplished

My last couple of posts have been about participating in the World Wide WP 5K Challenge. Automattic, the company that developed and maintains WordPress, challenged its bloggers to compete a 5K during the week of October 26 to November 1. They stressed that the 5K could be running, walking, or whatever. The challenge was to encourage its bloggers to get outside and move. They encouraged bloggers to use the “wwwp5k” tag on their posts and to take a picture as they crossed the finish line.

I decided to participate, and to participate by running a 5K, despite the fact–I’m not sure I’ve mentioned this–that I don’t like to run. During the week, I posted updates on my runs, as I attempted to work my way up to 5K.

Since a 5K was a significant challenge for me, I described it as The Epic Athletic Struggle of Fall, and noted that it was taking place at the same time as another epic athletic struggle: the World Series. As a lifelong fan of the Kansas City Royals, the World Series had taken on greater importance to me, and it interacted with my work on this challenge in interesting ways.

Having never been a runner, I started small, but with what was a significant accomplishment for me–about seven-tenths of a mile. I then increased that to 1 mile, and then to 2.5K (about 1.55 miles). The plan was to complete the 5K on Sunday, the last day of the challenge. But on Sunday, a morning Chiefs game, the deciding game of the World Series in the evening, and several other obligations in between kept me from completing the challenge.

So technically, I didn’t complete the challenge during the week of the challenge. But to me, the challenge has never been about a deadline; it’s been about accomplishing something I’ve never done before, and getting activity to support my ongoing efforts to get fit. With this in mind, I set out to complete the challenge on Monday morning.

I started early Monday morning, on four hours’ sleep, having gotten to bed late after celebrating the Royals’ World Series victory. I knew that doubling my previous longest distance would be difficult, but I wanted to try. I ended up completing only about 2.2 miles–nearly a mile short of my goal, and that distance included at least a small amount of walking.

Did I successfully complete my Epic Athletic Struggle of the Fall? By the technical standards of the challenge, no. I took eight days, not seven, and never did complete 3.1 miles (5K) in a single run. But over the eight days, I ran a total of 5.5 miles. Since Automattic emphasized that we could be flexible in how we meet the challenge, I could justify my total over four runs as meeting the 5K requirement.

Or, I could do that another way. Today–day 9 of the one-week challenge–I met the challenge another way. Today was the parade and civic celebration for the Kansas City Royals, and I was determined to go. My problem: the parade was scheduled to start at noon, and I had a meeting that wouldn’t end until noon. With hundreds of thousands expected to descend upon the two-mile long parade route, parking anywhere near the route was out of the question, especially given my late arrival. I ended up finally finding space just off 33rd Street, one block east of Troost.* I planned on catching the parade near Crown Center, as the southernmost point on the route.

*I know that won’t mean anything to many people, but those who are familiar with Kansas City will recognize how far that is from any point on the parade route. 

About halfway through the walk it hit me that I would end up walking (round trip) more than 5K. Had I realized it sooner, I would have tracked it through MapMyWalk. I did have the foresight to check my steps on Fitbit before I began, so that I could subtract that from my total upon returning to my car. I also would check Google Maps later to determine a distance. The results: I accumulated more than 8,000 steps on my trip to and from the parade, and Google Maps showed that I walked about 3.8 miles each way. So this extended walk also exceeded 5K. 

And, consistent with the Automattic’s suggestion, here is a picture–not of my finish line–but of the Royals parade at the finish line of their own Epic Athletic Struggle of Fall.

The parade through downtown Kansas City of the World Series champion Kansas City Royals.

The parade through downtown Kansas City of the World Series champion Kansas City Royals.

Finally, it is important to add that I haven’t given up on the goal of running a 5K. I’ll continue to add distance throughout November, with the goal of completing the Thanksgiving Day 5K that I mentioned in my first post of this series.

But don’t expect me to like running.

 

WWWP5K Update: Day 4

After a one day break, the epic athletic struggle of Fall continues.

One might think I’m referring to the World Series. I’m not. Unlike that other epic athletic struggle of Fall, this one doesn’t come with a change of city following the day off.

But there is a relationship between these two epic struggles. As a Royals fan, I was glued to the television Tuesday evening for Game 1 of the World Series…for fourteen innings. Or twelve innings, since I apparently fell asleep sometime in the 13th inning (although after waking up just after the game ended, I did watch the final two innings on DVR).

Actual photo of me in the 13th inning of Game 1 of the World Series, barely containing my excitement.

Actual photo of me in the 13th inning of Game 1 of the World Series, barely containing my excitement.

So after a very late night on Tuesday night, I was slow to get around Wednesday morning, and ended up not having time to run. Running after work was out of the question, because there was Game 2 of the World Series to watch.

So Thursday morning’s run came after a day off. It would have been easy to take another day off, when I checked the temperature outside and found that it was 35 degrees. Running outside was out of the question. I know there are people who run regularly in cold weather, but I will never be one of those people.

Instead, I went back to the treadmill. I was determined to top my one-mile run from Tuesday. As I got to the mile-and-a-quarter mark, I felt that I could keep going to make 1.5 miles. I did. From there, it made sense to keep going for an extra five-hundredths of a mile to make it halfway to 5K.

I was happy to make it halfway to my 5K goal. I had run further than I had ever run in a single run before. But I still don’t like running.

I’ve heard distance runners speak of a “runners high.” Perhaps I’d like running if that high would kick in. But I suspect that it takes a few more miles before one gets to the point where he or she experiences the high.

But I do think I experienced a “runner’s point of clarity.” It’s a realization that hit me as I was going beyond the mile mark: I was no more out of breath then, or after that point than I was at a half mile. It made me wonder: is the real challenge to running further not so much physical as mental? Does the point of the greatest feeling of breathlessness begin relatively early in a run and stay roughly constant until the run finishes? I’d be interested in hearing whether this is what other runners experience.

WWWP5K Update: Day 2

I still don’t like running.

This morning was my second day of running. Yesterday was a cold morning, and since I seem to have just caught a cold, I didn’t want to aggravate it by sucking in the chilly air, so I chose to run on the treadmill in our toasty basement. I ran about seven-tenths of a mile on the treadmill, then continued to walk at a slower pace for a while.

I woke up this morning and had an immediate realization: I apparently don’t use the same muscles for running that I use for walking. I was sore. Very sore. From running that short distance. I didn’t expect that.

My treadmill experience confirmed what I had suspected: that treadmill running is inferior to running outdoors. In my case, our treadmill is located in a corner, so I had to shorten my stride to keep from kicking the wall. So when I checked the temperature this morning and saw that it was warmer than yesterday, I decided to head outside.

I also knew that I wanted to increase the distance that I ran this morning. I was determined to hit the mile mark before I slowed down to a walk. I was tempted to stop several times, and my shoe that came untied at about the .8 mark was a really tempting excuse. But I made it to the one mile mark and immediately slowed down to a walk.

According to BringBackTheMile.com, Jim Ryun holds the record time for a Kansas male running the mile at 3:51.1 seconds. That record has stood since 1967. Jim should be worried; today’s mile was slightly more than 8 minutes slower than that. I’m sure that time will come down.

I still don’t like running.

I’m Taking a Run at a New Challenge

I hate running. 

Not running in general. I mean, I like activities that involve running, sometimes, but only for short times. I don’t mind running while playing basketball or football (something I used to do a lot more than I do now). And, of course, I’ve been known to come running when I’m called for dinner.

I hate running as an activity. 

I just don’t enjoy running for running’s sake. But I know that not everyone is like that. A number of my friends are runners, and regularly post their times and/or experiences on Facebook. I like seeing that, and I try to like their running status updates when I see them.

Plus, my son is a runner. He just finished his first year on his high school cross country team. I’ve really enjoyed going to his meets, and watching his progress throughout the year. It’s been a great activity for him, and it’s helped ease his transition into high school. It’s been great watching how the team members support one another, and how Wil has been included as an equal part of the team. I also enjoy watching him work for something that he likes. It’s something that I want to encourage him to do more of–to dedicate himself to improving during the off-season, to set goals, and to work toward meeting it.

I hate running as an activity for me.

I’m not sure why I hate running. It’s not that I think it’s pointless. I think runners like to get out and enjoy the scenery; that they prefer a changing landscape to the inside of a gym. I do to, but I get that out of other activities, such as walking.

It’s not that it makes me breathe hard. My favorite form of exercise is bicycling, which can elevate my heart rate and leave me breathless. In fact, I like to push myself on the bike. But cycling isn’t constant exertion. After a tough climb up a hill, there’s nothing like coasting down the hill, getting a chance to catch my breath. With running, there’s no coasting (or if there is, I’m not doing it right). So maybe it’s the fact that once you’re out of breath while running, you stay out of breath.

So I’ve started running.

Running will probably never be a big part of my fitness repertoire, but I’m going to give it a try.

The company that produces WordPress, the program I use to post this blog, has issued its annual Worldwide WordPress 5k Challenge. They challenge WordPress users–as well as readers of WordPress blogs–to complete a 5k during the week that ends November 1. They have apparently done this for several years, but I’m not sure I’ve ever paid attention before. For whatever reason, this year it caught my eye.

I’m hoping to generate more views of my blog by being a part of this challenge. The good people at WordPress encourage us to blog about our experience and tag those posts with “wwwp5k”, which I’ve done for this post. I’m hoping there are a couple of people who will follow this, read this post, and say to themselves, “Hey, this guy’s pretty funny/inspirational/(insert your favorite adjective here). I think I’ll follow his blog.”

The rules are pretty simple, and pretty lenient. They stress that there’s no time limit (I suspect that one could even accomplish it in multiple shifts), and they stress that participants can complete it by running, walking, even skipping. So I could walk for 5 kilometers–something I know that I could do easily–but I take the word “challenge” seriously. That’s why I won’t feel I’ve met my challenge without running.

I started working on it this morning. Instead of waking up and spending time on the elliptical machine or walking, I got on the treadmill and set it for 5 miles per hour. That’s hardly a breakneck pace, but it was too fast to walk, so I had to run on the treadmill. I finished about 3/4 of a mile before I slowed it down (to 4 MPH, a brisk walk pace), but kicked it back up to 5 MPH again after a couple of minutes. I probably ran for only about a mile, but was a start.

Even if I don’t complete the challenge by Sunday, I will still be working toward something else. My family has signed up for the Ward Parkway Thanksgiving Day 5K. It’s both a competitive race and a fun run, so I’m not under pressure to run the whole thing, but I don’t want to walk any of it.

I don’t expect this to lead to a lifetime of regular running. But I’m hoping that I might break down by dread of running a bit. Who knows, maybe I’ll finally discover the answer to something that’s puzzled me for years: why do some runners insist on running in the street right next to a perfectly good sidewalk?

My Mind is the Diet Borg

A recurring theme of this blog is that I’m a nerd. Few of you who know me will be surprised to hear that, and I freely admit it. I even made “I’m such a nerd” one of the blog post categories listed on the right side of the page, so you can easily find all 12 of the posts (including this one) that fall into that category. So it should come as no surprise that I enjoy watching Star Trek in all of its forms. I particularly like Star Trek: The Next Generation, (or TNG).

TNG had its share of Klingons and Romulans–carryovers from the original series–but it introduced us to a new set of aliens: The Borg. The Borg traveled through space conquering entire planets and incorporating them into their collective consciousness, so they were always changing as they encountered and assimilated new civilizations, life forms, and technology.

This adaptability made The Borg a formidable opponent. They encountered the Enterprise in several episodes of TNG (and at least one movie). Enterprise‘s weapons would initially do damage to the Borg ship, but the Borg would quickly adapt its defenses, rendering Enterprise‘s weapons useless, and requiring the crew to scramble to find new ways to stop the unrelenting advance of The Borg.

The Borg traveled through space in this menacing-looking vessel. My mind travels through my diet in a similarly menacing-looking vessel.

The Borg traveled through space in this menacing-looking vessel. My mind travels through my weight loss in a similarly menacing-looking vessel.

Like the crew of the Enterprise, my diet encounters its fair share of the usual enemies: French fries, potato chips, pizza, etc. While they’re not completely powerless, my diet can usually overcome them without too much difficulty. But my diet has met its most formidable adversary: my mind.

One of my more frequent topics on this blog has been the mind games involved in weight loss (“Mind Games” is also one of the categories of blog posts; you can click on it to see all of the posts about mind games that I’ve written). I’ve found that it’s easy to sabotage one’s weight loss using the power of the mind. And my mind has been particularly adept at adapting to whatever weapons I use to defend my weight loss.

This has been apparent during my current weight loss. As I’ve mentioned countless times (ad nauseum, you say?), I rely on some technological tools: I track my food and count calories using My Fitness Pal, and keep track of my activity and exercise using Map My Walk(/Ride/Run) and my Fitbit. My Fitbit syncs with My Fitness Pal, so that I get an estimate of the calories I burn each day with the steps my Fitbit tracks. On top of that, I can manually add exercise and get estimates of calorie burns using My Fitness Pal’s database But that’s where the mind games start. My Fitness Pal graciously adds the calories burned back into the calories available for eating during the remainder of the day.

About a month before I left for Philmont, I noticed that my pace of weight loss seemed to be slowing down. After thinking about this, I decided that a contributing factor was that I was relying too much on the credit that the tools were giving me for exercise, and actually increasing my calorie intake as a result. While I was still losing weight, I wasn’t happy with the pace, so I decided to stop tracking my exercise. I thought that by doing that, I would trick myself into eating less while burning the same amount of calories, thereby losing more weight.

And it worked…for a while. I noticed that after starting this new approach, I was once again losing weight at a faster pace. I was able to sustain that pace basically until I left for Philmont, and probably a few days after, when I resumed tracking again.

But then my mind went to work. My strategy relied not just on my not tracking exercise, but actively ignoring the credit that My Fitness Pal gave me for my steps tracked through Fitbit. That required me to mentally subtract out the those calories from what My Fitness Pal showed me were available. Over time, it was easier to not subtract, or to purposefully subtract fewer calories, allowing me to eat more.

Even doing that, however, I was able to continue to lose some weight. So my mind needed to continue to adapt. Its next step was to further make adjustments for the exercise not entered. So, while Fitbit gives me partial credit for spending time on the elliptical (I’ve noticed that each revolution on the elliptical results in one step being registered by Fitbit), the number of steps that Fitbit tracks does not come close to the calorie burn that the elliptical machine shows me I burned (or, for that matter, what the My Fitness Pal database says that amount of time I spend on the elliptical should burn). Knowing that, my brain tries to add the higher estimate of the calorie burn back into the available calories number that My Fitness Pal gives me.

These mind games are all tricks. They’re designed to override my mind, which eventually sees through the tricks. In the end, tricks themselves aren’t effective over the long run, and there’s just no substitute for doing things the right way without any tricks at all.

Weekends at Calorie Burine’s

Thursday, August 20
I’m starting this post on a Thursday evening, and I’m already beginning to think about the upcoming weekend. I won’t be stuck behind a desk, so naturally I’ll be more active. Without having ten hours of my day tied up with work and commuting, I’ll be able to dedicate more time to exercise, so I’ll burn even more calories than I do on an average weekday. I’m really going to lose some serious weight this weekend.

Or, maybe not.

If recent history is any indication, I’m not likely to lose much (if any) weight this weekend. The past two weekends are examples of what I’ve been experiencing lately.

On the weekend of August 8-9, I hit my step goal one day, and just missed it on the other day. On Saturday I biked 25.5 miles, burning hundreds of calories I wouldn’t have burned otherwise. But when I weighed on Monday morning, my weight was about a pound higher than it was at the start of the weekend.

This past weekend was similar. I hit my step goal on both days. I had a bike ride of 29.67 miles. And I took a 2.77 mile walk. And I lost weight–a whopping two-tenths of a pound!

I’ve been thinking a lot about this apparent paradox, trying to figure out why I don’t lose weight, even though my activity level increases significantly. Here’s what I’ve come up with.

One Good Turn Deserves a Bad One – Knowing that I have expended more calories, I find it easier to rationalize eating more and different food from what I consume during the week. I followed the 25.5 mile bike ride with a fairly big barbecue lunch.* Exercise becomes my rationalization for poor food choices.

*Hayward’s, if you’re keeping track. I couldn’t turn down the masa-dusted sweet potato fries now, could I?

Predictably Unpredictable – During the week, I’m generally in control of my schedule. I can eat when I want** and can plan around meal times. But during the weekends, I don’t have a set schedule, and must manage my eating around other family members’ schedules. Often we’ll end up having lunch or dinner (or both) later than we do during the week. When that happens, I find that I will be more likely to snack when my body says it’s meal time, and then eat the same size meal that I would have had without the snack. I think that’s adding many more calories to my weekend intake than I think I’m adding at the time.

**Who am I kidding? I want to eat all the time. 

Water, Water Everywhere, but Nary a Drop During the WeekI’ve been hearing for a long time about the importance of water intake to weight loss. But I’ve heard mixed signals. I’ve heard from dieticians that tea and even diet soda are almost as good as water, but everyone seems to agree that water is the best thing to drink if one wants to lose weight. During the week, I tend to drink more tea and Diet Coke than water, mostly because I need the caffeine (my lack of sleep is an entirely different subject that I could blog about). While I drink plenty, I think that I end up getting a little dehydrated during the week. On weekends, when I exercise more, I end up drinking more water, especially when I have more strenuous activity such as a hike or a long bike ride. But because I haven’t had so much water during the week, I think my body retains more of that water, meaning that activity that would normally result in weight loss doesn’t produce the loss that I expected.

Sunday, August 23
It’s now late Sunday evening, and I’ve had another active weekend. Yesterday I exceeded by step goal by more than 2,000 steps, and today I rode the bike more than 20 miles. I tried to be mindful of the issues I discussed above, by watching my snacking and avoid giving myself bonus exercise calories. This morning’s weigh-in gave me good news, but I’ll see when I weigh myself tomorrow morning whether I’ve broken the cycle of weekend disappointment.

 

Accomplishments Can Be Dangerous

In my post about my pre-Philmont weight loss I wrote about my annual physical, with a doctor I had never seen before. As one would expect, much of our conversation concerned my weight and my weight loss. We discussed my upcoming visit to the Philmont Scount Ranch, and that I was focused on losing sufficient weight to be allowed to go on our Philmont trek.

My doctor was impressed with the progress I had made. He knew that I was focused on making weight, but he didn’t want me to focus solely on making weight. In fact, he was worried about my mindset if I was not successful. “If you don’t make weight, don’t let that stop your weight loss,” he cautioned me.

I appreciated his concern, but I advised him that he didn’t need to worry. I told him that I was not just losing weight for Philmont, and that I planned on continuing my weight loss after Philmont.

Perhaps his advice should have been about my reaction to making weight, instead of missing my target.

I’ve been back from Philmont now for about seven weeks. In that time my weight has fluctuated, but as I write this my weight is exactly where it was when I left for Philmont. It’s not for lack of effort–I’ve been exercising regularly, and most days I’ve been staying on program. But I’ve been making exceptions (or perhaps excuses) that put the pounds back on as soon as I take them off. All kinds of special occasions–family gatherings, holidays, special dinners, and the like–have been reasons to temporarily overeat. In between, I’ve lost weight, but it’s the weight I put on as a result of those special occasions. Like the old joke, I’ve literally lost the same five pounds about four or five times in the last month-and-a-half.

It hit me that this pattern is something I’ve seen before. The common denominator is that it tends to happen immediately following some milestone or achievement. I tend to break my weight loss down into a series of goals, but some of these goals are more significant than others. Most of the time, I can pass one goal and move smoothly on to the next, but when I hit a bigger goal, I tend to relax afterwards.

I think I’ve been in one of those periods. Hitting my Philmont target weight was a major goal. So, upon my return from Philmont, I found it easy to relax a bit, making exceptions, which led to excuses. Those excuses, in turn, have led to the plateau I’ve found myself on right now.

My challenge is to make sure that this plateau doesn’t become something worse. I say that, because that’s typically how my past weight losses have ended. I haven’t ever quit a weight loss because I’ve hit my goal weight, I’ve quit after a plateau, brought on by cutting corners in my weight loss plan, following the achievement of a milestone.

How can I assure that this plateau doesn’t turn into another long term weight gain? I think it’s a matter of desire. I remain motivated to lose more weight. I’m pleased to be down 50 pounds in just over eight months, but I’m not satisfied. My plateaus are mental challenges more than they are physical challenges. I have to let that dissatisfaction override my temptation to make more frequent diversions off the plan. I’m confident I can do that.

 

 

Philmont Log: Day -157 to Day 0

Note: When Wil and I were at Philmont Scout Ranch in June, we were given little notebooks and encouraged to keep a log and record our thoughts. I took some pretty extensive notes, and thought I might turn them into a journal, perhaps annotated with pictures, which I might post online if anyone is interested. While I started my notes at Day 1, my Philmont journey is not complete without including my journey that led up to Philmont. What follows will be the opening part of that journal. 

Day -157: Today is the day I got serious about preparing for Philmont. We signed up to go to Philmont almost a year before. At that time, the experience of hiking in Utah after having lost a significant amount of weight was fresh on my mind. I knew that I would need to lose more weight to be ready for Philmont–that Philmont had strict height-and-weight standards, but that challenge seemed manageable. However, over the rest of 2014, my weight moved the wrong direction. Still, I arrived at December 1 (Day -189) needing to lose something like 39 pounds over about 6 1/2 months. It would require work, but it seemed manageable. However, it would require losing at least some weight in December, something that seemed about as impossible to pull off as the roommate switch from Seinfeld. But I felt that if I could get to January 1 needing only about 30 pounds to lose in half a year, I would be in great shape.*

*OK, not great shape. I mean, I’d be out of shape. But I’d be in good position to be in shape–or at least in shape enough to meet the height/weight requirements. 

But that morning I was confronted with the stark realization that peanut brittle, Christmas cookies, and office holiday party fare are not, in fact, diet food. I gained weight in December. I was looking at having to lose more than 50 pounds by early June. While not impossible, I knew it was going to be a real challenge.

Day -148: Preparing for Philmont means getting in Philmont shape. Getting in Philmont shape involves both meeting the weight requirements, and getting accustomed to long hikes carrying sufficient weight. Crews (groups of Scouts and their adult advisors–usually from the same troop–going through Philmont together) are advised to take a number of practice hikes. Crews are encouraged to take these hikes of increasing length, and with weight comparable to what they will be carrying at Philmont (about 35-45 pounds per person). This day was the first practice hike for me. While we were encouraged to carry all of the gear that we would be carrying at Philmont, I hadn’t bought a backpack yet, so I had to improvise by carrying a smaller backpack, like those students carry their books in. I stuffed about 25 pounds of weights into the bag, hoping that it would reasonably simulate what I would experience at Philmont.

It was a rare comfortable Sunday afternoon in January. The course we had chosen had a number of changes in elevation, which we hoped would help to simulate what we would experience at Philmont. The difficulty of the course, and the fact that this was the first training hike for most of us held up our progress. We had planned to hike for about eight miles, but our crew moved more slowly than we had planned, and completed only about 4.5 miles. Nevertheless, by the end of the hike, I was worn out. I was sore all over–my back, my knees, my ankles, and my feet. The thought of having to hike again filled me with dread, and I worried about how I would feel the next day. I couldn’t fathom ten straight days of hiking, which was what we would be doing at Philmont. Completing our 62-mile trek (the Philmont term for our itinerary) seemed impossible. On the way home from the hike, the apparent impossibility of completing a multi-day hike, coupled with the daunting weight loss challenge had me convinced that I had made the worst mistake of my life.  I began thinking about ways I could back out. Just about he only thing that held me back was the knowledge that I had already paid the sizable non-refundable registration fee.

Day -147: I was still sore from the previous day’s hike, and still wondering how I would be able to complete hikes on consecutive days, let alone ten straight days. I was also still focused on the weight loss challenge, but I did re-check the height and weight requirements, and got a mildly pleasant surprise that the weight limit was a few pounds higher than I thought it was. As of this day, I needed to lose 40 pounds in 147 days–challenging, but achievable.

Day -120: We took our second practice hike as a crew on this day. A couple of weeks earlier, I had hiked for a couple of hours with the family, which went better. Of course, I wasn’t hiking with weights, and the terrain was both smoother and less hilly that what we had done on our practice hike. Nevertheless, I was encouraged. The weather for this day’s hike was nice again, but it followed a week of precipitation, and the trail was very muddy, which slowed us down considerably, keeping our distance hiked low–only about 2.8 miles. What was most remarkable about this hike, however, was how the muddy trails required so much more effort on each step. With the unstable footing, we found ourselves sliding every time we had to put our feet down, and had to expend considerable energy on each step to keep from sliding. I ended up sore and tired, but not thoroughly wiped out. I was encouraged, but I kept in the back of my mind that we covered very little distance at a slow pace, and we would have to do more distance faster to be ready for Philmont. And, having lost more than 15 pounds, I was feeling somewhat better about meeting the weight requirement.

Day -100: Shortly after the good feelings about weight and the second practice hike, I hit a stumbling block–Valentine’s Day. I gained a couple of pounds that weekend, which seemed to take forever to take off again. I realized that the I could not afford setbacks like this–no matter how small–with the timeline I was faced with. Two months into the year (and the weight loss), I had lost 17 pounds. I needed to lose 32 more over three months, leaving me little room for error.

Day -92: This was the third practice hike with the crew, and also marked exactly three months until our first day at Philmont. We were hiking at a different location on a trail that was much flatter than our first couple of hikes. This was also my first hike with my new backpack. Our course took us on a nearly five mile hike–the longest hike I had been on. I remember being tired at the end of the hike–more tired than I felt I should be, knowing that we would have longer hikes most days at Philmont–but less tired that I was for the first couple of hikes. I was encouraged that the backpack distributed the weight I had to carry much more effectively, but I also wondered how much of the difference in how I felt was due to the easier terrain. With three months left, I still needed to lose 29 pounds–basically ten pounds per month, a pace that I had been able to pull off before.

Day -91: My weight loss plan is built on counting calories and increasing my exercise. Hike days are days when I expend a lot of calories, and therefore, I should see weight loss on those days. I do increase my caloric intake slightly on hike days–snacks on the trail for energy–and view my phone apps’ estimates of calories burned very skeptically, but I’m certain that I still rack up huge calorie deficits on those days. However, the day after each of the last two hikes, I ended up showing a weight gain. I was counting on these hikes to help accelerate the weight loss.

Day -81: The scheduled crew hikes were becoming more frequent. This hike was back on the original trail–the bridle trail around Wyandotte County Lake, and was planned to be longer–this time entirely circling the lake. I’m not sure what the final mileage was (I shut off the app at 7.61 miles with still about a quarter of the hike remaining). In each of our previous practice hikes, I had “hit the wall” near the end of each hike, reaching a point where it was difficult to continue. This hike also had its wall, which hit me about the same time I shut off my phone. It was as if my energy was tied to the battery level on my phone, so that when I noticed the phone was running low, my energy left me. The last two-or-so miles were incredibly difficult–so difficult, that I told the rest of the crew to go on ahead, leaving me to finish at my own slow pace. Each time I have hit the wall, the experience has been different. Every wall has been marked by fatigue–a total lack of energy–along with (and perhaps caused by) a different part of my body being painful. On the first hike it was my ankles and knees. The second hike seemed to hurt my hips, and my ankles were also sore. I was determined to fix the ankle problem with new boots, which I was breaking in on this third hike. I had previously been wearing low-top hiking boots, so my new boots were higher, giving more ankle support. They seemed to help with the ankle pain, but because they were brand new and not broken in, I ended up with painful blisters on both feet.

Day -69: The next dietary stumbling block was a conference I attend in Washington, DC every year. The trip comes with all kinds of threats: snacks on the airplane, unhealthy meals, receptions, snacks during conference breaks, and exhibitors that draw attendees to their booths with big bowls of candy. I’ve written before about the challenges I face when I go to this annual conference. Again, with around 20 pounds still to lose in just over two months, I couldn’t afford to have a significant setback. I ended up gaining two pounds in the five days of the conference, which was disappointing, but not yet a crisis. But it was encouraging that I was able to lose those two pounds in just three days.

This trip was also significant because of the practice hike that I missed. While I didn’t go, Wil did, and he came back limping. He had stumbled a couple of times and apparently hurt himself. He was still able to walk–albeit with a limp–so we didn’t take him to a doctor until a few days letter, when his leg didn’t seem to be improving. Eventually, we found out that he had a stress fracture in his femur. Suddenly, Wil’s trip to Philmont–and probably mine, since Wil was the main reason I wanted to go–was in jeopardy.

Day -60: The next practice hike was scheduled for a weekend campout. I went without Wil, since he was on crutches and was ordered not to put any weight on his broken leg. The hike was on a rocky trail at Elk City Lake near Independence, KS. We drove to the lake on Friday evening, camped overnight, and got up the next morning to begin our hike. The trail was a good test for Philmont, because it was very rocky. Although the trail didn’t involve significant elevation changes, the rocky terrain slowed us down and wore us down. By the end of our approximately nine mile hike, I was nearly as worn out as I had been on any of our other hikes. Upon returning to my tent, I bent down to take off my boots, and was hit with with cramps in my quads. This was an all-too-common occurrence for me: I developed cramps within a couple of hours of many of my practice hikes, and would often get cramps in the middle of the night when camping. I knew that not being sufficiently hydrated can cause cramping, but I thought I was being careful to drink enough water during the hikes. The frequency of cramps, both following hikes and while camping, was another reason to be concerned about Philmont.

Day -43: Less than a month-and-a-half before our departure, I visited the doctor both because I was due for my annual physical, and because I needed to have him complete the physical form that had to be turned in to Philmont. A key element of this form is the certification of my height and weight. I knew that I wouldn’t make weight by the time of this appointment, but also knew that the “official” weigh-in would occur at Philmont, so I wasn’t overly concerned. But the appointment gave me new reasons to be concerned. It started when I called to set the appointment and learned that the doctor I had seen for the past ten years was no longer with the practice. I had to make the appointment with a doctor I had never seen before. But even worse, upon checking in, I had a new reason for panic. I was counting on being measured at six feet tall, but came in at 5′ 10 1/2″. This was significant, because it lowered my target weight by six pounds, meaning that I had to lose an additional six pounds beyond what I had been counting on for several months.

So my mindset had already gone negative before the doctor even walked into the examination room. When he entered, we talked about why I was getting the physical, and the topic of Philmont came up. I learned that he had been on the medical staff at Philmont about ten years earlier,** and so he shared a lot of his Philmont knowledge with me. He told me that when he had been there, the medical staff were able to build some flexibility into the height and weight guidelines, allowing them to take into consideration recent weight loss or other factors. He encouraged me to remain positive and to continue to work, and led me to believe that I would likely be allowed to remain at Philmont even if I didn’t meet the published weight goal.***

**For 57 years, the University of Kansas School of Medicine has had its medical students (under the supervision of faculty) serve as medics at Philmont. My doctor had been one of those students a few years back. But what this means is that my new doctor had been in medical school only ten years ago. Since my previous doctor had been a few years older than I am, it was an adjustment switching to a much younger doctor.

***This conversation will figure into a future post, as well. I’ll just leave that cliffhanger here to tease you. 

Day -21: I continued to lose weight, at a steady, but unspectacular rate. I found myself daily doing the mental math to compare the amount of weight I still needed to lose with the number of days remaining before Philmont, and the rate at which I had been losing weight up to this date. At the time of my physical, I had been on a rate that would allow me to reach my target weight. However, the additional six pounds that I needed to lose after the physical, coupled with what seemed to be a slowing rate of weight loss put me on a path that would see me arriving at Philmont above the maximum weight for my (now lower) height.

So I made two key changes. First, I decided to stop tracking my exercise. I thought that one of the reasons that my weight loss seemed to be slowing down might be that I was using my exercise as a reason to eat more. Tracking the exercise in My Fitness Pal raised the total number of calories I could consume in a day, and I felt that I was increasing my calorie consumption as a result. My plan was to continue to exercise as much as usual (or even increase my exercise), but not give myself the caloric credit for doing so. The second change was to stop drinking diet soda, and to substitute water (for the most part). I’ve heard conflicting stories about the effect of diet soda on weight loss, but figured that making this change couldn’t hurt.****

****I gave up diet soda for Lent. During that six-week period, I lost ten pounds, which was actually a slower rate of weight loss than my I had before and after Lent. 

Day -1: Sunday, June 7 was the day we left Kansas City for Philmont. We were taking a 10:30 PM train from Kansas City to Raton, NM, so we were scheduled to meet at the train station at 9:00. One of the last things I did before leaving for the train station was to weigh myself. My weight was 6.2 pounds over my target (but only .2 pounds over what my target would have been when I thought I was 6 feet tall). I still had two days before the official weigh-in, so I thought I still had a chance to get at least close to my target weight. But that meant I would have to continue to be vigilant about my eating for the following two days.

Day 1: Philmont is considered to be a 12-day experience, but only ten days are spent in “the back country.” Day 1 and Day 12 are spent entirely at base camp. Our health check, when the final weigh-in would occur, was scheduled for the afternoon of Day 1. Between our departure from Kansas City, I had breakfast on the train, lunch at McDonald’s in Raton, and three meals in the mess hall at base camp. Of these meals, the ones in the mess hall were the toughest, because Philmont provides high calorie meals (and plenty of food). I passed up some appetizing items and ate small amounts of other things, hoping to make enough progress to at least be close to the target weight.

Our crew, on the morning of Day 1, about six hours before the weigh-in. You can almost see the nerves in my facial expression.

Our crew, on the morning of Day 1, about six hours before the weigh-in. You can almost see the nerves in my facial expression.

As the time for health check came closer, I was feeling a strange and contradictory mixture of nerves and confidence. The logical side of me thought it was unlikely that I would lose six pounds in two days, but my gut (which, let’s face it, is much bigger than my logical side) was telling me everything would be alright. Finally, it was time for my health check. The health check consisted of a review of my medical form, complete with questions about my medical history, follow-ups to items listed on the form, and–since my weight listed on the form was over the maximum allowed for my height–a re-check of my weight.

We had been conditioned to believe that the staff conducting the health checks were strict and businesslike, but I was met by a pleasant young woman. She glanced at my form and then back at me, and her first words to me were, “You’re not 6 feet? That can’t be correct.” With those words, I knew I had a friend. I mentioned that used to always consider myself to be 5’11”, but that on one visit to the doctor I had been measured at 6 feet, so that was what I had gone by until my latest physical. Her response was, “Well, let’s just check it again.” “I suppose you need to measure me without my boots,” I said. To my surprise, she told me I could leave them on. This woman is definitely a friend, I thought.

I stood against the far wall of the health check lodge, where a tape measure had been attached, hopeful. My new friend casually walked up and placed a ruler on my head, up against the tape measure. “You’re six feet tall,” she announced. I felt a strong sense of relief, but the real moment of truth–the weigh in–could take that away pretty quickly. And that weigh-in was the only thing left to do. My new friend asked me to head over to the scales.

Preparing for a test often involves both studying the material and developing a test-taking strategy. So too with my weigh-in. Sure, I had devoted months to losing weight, but I had also devoted considerable mental energy to how I wanted the weigh-in itself to go. Although it appeared to be a widely-held belief within our Scout troop that the final weigh-in would be conducted with boots on, all of the written material we had received from Philmont emphasized that the final weigh-in would be conducted “in stocking feet.” So before heading to the scales, I went back to the chair to remove my boots. But I didn’t stop there. My strategy was to remove as much weight that wasn’t actually me as modesty would permit (and modesty might just have to be sacrificed, too). I planned not just to remove my boots, but to empty my pockets, take off my watch, remove my belt. Kris had suggested all of those things to me in the train station, and she even advised taking off my wedding ring (you can supply your own joke here). I had even made sure that when I had gotten dressed that morning, I put on my shorts that fit most comfortably without a belt, anticipating taking it off for the weigh-in. So, after removing my boots, my watch came off, my pockets were emptied, and I even removed my wedding ring.

I headed over to the scales, stepped up on them, and immediately had an “Oh, crap!” moment. I had forgotten to remove my belt! I could end up being sent home because of the extra six ounces of leather (or a reasonable facsimile) and metal I was wearing! Helplessly, I looked down at the digital readout on the scale. The number I wanted to see was 239 pounds. The readout flashed 239.0, then 239.2, then back to 239.0, where it finally–after what seemed like a minute of wavering but was probably about three seconds–settled. I had hit the target number EXACTLY. I was going to get to stay at Philmont.

Watch What You Eat; Watch What You Read

I’ve been working on a longer post, which is taking more time than I though it would. Since I don’t want too much time to lapse between posts, I decided to take a break from working on that post to do something that I could put up relatively quickly.

When I’m losing weight, I seem to pay more attention to weight loss in the media. I’m more likely to watch programs like The Biggest Loser and Extreme Weight Loss when I’m losing weight. And I think I’m also much more likely to pay attention to news about diet and weight.

One such story grabbed my attention last week. I first heard about when it was briefly mentioned on the local morning news. Later that day, I saw a longer story in a daily news summary e-mail I receive from The Washington Post. That led me to read the full news story, and, ultimately, to track down the news release that prompted both stories.

The story was about a study conducted by researchers at King’s College London, which examined electronic medical records of nearly 300,000 people to determine weight loss trends. While the study had more than one conclusion about weight loss, the news stories picked up on one central finding: the chances of an obese person returning to a normal weight are extremely remote (1 in 210 for men, 1 in 124 for women).

The Washington Post story included this graphic, which I think really makes it clear how remote these chances are (click on the graphic to enlarge it):

imrs.phpAs someone whose weight still falls in the obese range, this headline caught my attention. In fact, on the surface, the news is pretty discouraging. One could read this as saying that I’m not likely to be successful.

After examining the news release and the Washington Post story more closely, I decided the news didn’t have to be so depressing, for a couple of reasons.

First, the headlines were misleading. The headlines made it sound as if the lifetime chances were remote, but the statistics quoted (1 in 210 and 1 in 124) were annual chances. In other words, a man has a 1 in 210 chance of returning to a normal rate in any given year. But his lifetime chances would be much greater than that: over 30 years, his chances of returning to a normal weight would be roughly 30 in 210, or 1 in 7.* One chance in 7 is still not great, but it’s a lot more promising than 1 in 210.**

*I’m sure a statistician would say that it’s not quite as simple as multiplying 1/210 times 30, because there are issues involving “with or without replacement” and other factors, but I think the 30 in 210 calculation is still roughly accurate. 

**Even 1 in 7 is the chance of returning to normal, but not necessarily remaining there. That’s a whole different challenge, which I’m sure I’ll revisit in a later blog entry. 

Second, and perhaps more importantly, I’ve already beaten the odds, which encourages me that I might be able to beat these 1 in 210 odds. The study also examined the chances that an obese person lost 5 percent of his or her body weight in a given year. For men, those chances were 1 in 12, and for women, they were 1 in 10. I’ve done better than that: I have now lost more than 5% of my body weight four times in the last nine years. That gives me faith that I might be the exception to the rule, and that perhaps I’ll be the 1 in the 210 that reaches “normal.”

It’s easy to get discouraged. Losing weight is hard. But so is getting to the truth behind these studies, when one only looks at the headlines.